“How Trigger Warnings Are Hurting Mental Health on Campus” – The Atlantic

I keep hearing about the coddling of America’s college students, but I’ve been teaching at a major university for almost 10 years and I haven’t seen it. People keep talking about “trigger warnings” and “microaggressions” but it’s not my students. This article in the Atlantic claims, “This new climate is slowly being institutionalized, and is affecting what can be said in the classroom, even as a basis for discussion.” I have not seen this either. There has always been some students who don’t like hearing things they don’t agree with, but this is not new.

Reading the article, it seems that they base their claims on a few extreme examples that are not indicative of the college experience across the board. They also misconstrue the purpose of Safe zones. I’m not an expert on these spaces, but from what I know from students, they are not meant to protect students from confronting ideas and beliefs they don’t like. They are places where students who experience discrimination can go to be themselves without fear of bullying, condemnation, or harassment. They still live in the real world where they are confronted by ideas and people they do not like. Nor are their examples of “coddling” an indication of what happens in the classroom, with a few exceptions as pointed out by the article. All professors that I know respect their students and do not intentionally go out of their way to offend their students, but they have not avoided teaching topics that may be uncomfortable for some students, even if the students feel offended as a result.

And I think it’s unfair to call these students coddled when they are under tremendous pressure to succeed (often defined solely in terms of financial success). They are also under a lot of pressure to achieve perfection in all aspects of their lives, which is in part responsible for the rise in student suicides.

Read the entire article here: How Trigger Warnings Are Hurting Mental Health on Campus – The Atlantic.

Coddling students

“This Is How Syrian Antiquities Are Being Smuggled And Sold” – BuzzFeed News

Mike Giglio and Munzer al-Awad give us an in-depth view of the antiquities trade in Syria at BuzzFeed. The sell off of the precious cache of ancient antiquities in Syria took off after the war began four years ago. It’s hard to read. The Syrians are losing their lives, their livelihoods, and their heritage.

And it is not just ISIS that is engaged in selling off these historical treasures, many Syrians have been forced by circumstances to participate in the illegal trade. As one of the Syrians admitted, “We feel bad because we are stealing our history and selling it for a cheap price…But we have become homeless and jobless, so we don’t care.” They’re just trying to survive and this lucrative trade is one of the few options open to them. The only thing that will stop this trade is the return of peace and a robust economy that doesn’t put Syrians in the position of selling off their history in order to survive.

Read the entire article here: This Is How Syrian Antiquities Are Being Smuggled And Sold – BuzzFeed News.

Wreckage in Qusayr, a city in Syria’s western Homs province. Joseph Eid / Getty Images

Wreckage in Qusayr, a city in Syria’s western Homs province. Joseph Eid / Getty Images

“The Second Amendment Con Job” | History News Network

The historian Gregory J. W. Urwin debunks some of the self-serving Second Amendment narrative perpetuated by the NRA.  Urwin’s essay is insufficient, but I applaud his effort. We need more historians pushing back against the seriously flawed and deadly NRA interpretation of the Second Amendment. The stakes are too high for them to remain on the sidelines.
Read Urwin’s brief overview of the history of the Second Amendment here: History News Network | The Second Amendment Con Job.

second amendment

“Only One Occupied Country in Europe Rose to the Defense of Jews During World War II” | History News Network

This is a little known story about Denmark’s brave role in saving Jews. The story is quite remarkable and inspirational. If only more people had shown the same moral fortitude that the Danes did, many more Jews could have been saved.

There were many brave individuals who risked their own lives to save Jews in all European nations, but as Yoav J. Tenembaum points out  “there was a singular nation that, as a collective endeavor, saved most of its Jews: Denmark.” However, credit should also be given to the Italians, who protected their Jews despite the fact they were allies with the Nazis. It was only after they were occupied by the Germans that Italian Jews were sent to the camps. They also protected non-Italian Jews in the areas of the Balkans that were under their control.

It’s unfortunate that these acts of heroism are little known. I think we could learn a lot from these acts of bravery.

Read the story here: History News Network | Only One Occupied Country in Europe Rose to the Defense of Jews During World War II..

Jewish refugees rescued by Denmark

Fareed Zakaria: Why We Still Need Liberal Education

I know I have already discussed Fareed Zakaria’s book promoting the humanities, but the topic is so important it’s worth repeating. Not to mention the fact that Diane Ravitch did a great job highlighting the most important points from his book.

dianeravitch's avatarDiane Ravitch's blog

Fareed Zakaria warns that fears about STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) are greatly overblown.

Zakaria comes close to acknowledging that the “crisis” rhetoric of so-called reformers is a myth,or as Berliner and Biddle called it years ago, “a manufactured crisis.”

The demand fo expand STEM is often accompanied by disdain for liberal education, writes Zakaria:

“If Americans are united in any conviction these days, it is that we urgently need to shift the country’s education toward the teaching of specific, technical skills. Every month, it seems, we hear about our children’s bad test scores in math and science — and about new initiatives from companies, universities or foundations to expand STEM courses (science, technology, engineering and math) and deemphasize the humanities. From President Obama on down, public officials have cautioned against pursuing degrees like art history, which are seen as expensive luxuries in today’s world. Republicans want to go…

View original post 429 more words

“Mike Huckabee Is Wrong: Iran Isn’t Nazi Germany” – The Atlantic

In case it wasn’t obvious, here’s a thorough take down of the Nazi Germany/Iran analogy: Mike Huckabee Is Wrong: Iran Isn’t Nazi Germany – The Atlantic.

Irans revolutionary guards

“At Sea With Joseph Conrad” – The New York Times

Few know that Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness was based on real events. The material for the novel came from his experiences in King Leopold’s Congo. The horrors that were committed in the Congo under Leopold have largely been forgot because it was overshadowed by the Great War (WWI). If you’re not familiar with this history, I would highly recommend reading King Leopold’s Ghost by Adam Hochschild.  You can’t  understand what’s happening in the Democratic Republic of Congo today without understanding this history.

But it is not the Congo that is the focus of Maya Jasanoff’s essay on Joseph Conrad. It is his adventures at sea that have captivated her. She explains: “the more I read Conrad, the more I realized that I had to get on a tall ship like the ones he knew best, and experience its unique ways of moving, working and speaking.”

Read about her interesting adventures following the footsteps of Conrad here:  At Sea With Joseph Conrad – The New York Times.

The Heart of Darkness Conrad

Christian Appy: “Our ‘Merciful’ Ending to the ‘Good War'” |History News Network

Seventy years ago today, the U.S. dropped an atomic bomb on Nagasaki. Just three days earlier Hiroshima had suffered the same fate. The debate over the necessity of dropping these bombs on continues to be highly contentious and divisive. Despite the fact that there has been a growing body of evidence that challenges the standard narrative (see below) of these events, this comforting narrative shows no sign of abating in public memory. Since I’ve already addressed this topic in a previous post, I’d like to address a related, but very important issue brought up by Christian Appy.

He challenges to consider these questions:

“Will an American president ever offer a formal apology? Will our country ever regret the dropping of ‘Little Boy’ and ‘Fat Man,’ those two bombs that burned hotter than the sun? Will it absorb the way they instantly vaporized thousands of victims, incinerated tens of thousands more, and created unimaginably powerful shockwaves and firestorms that ravaged everything for miles beyond ground zero? Will it finally come to grips with the ‘black rain’ that spread radiation and killed even more people — slowly and painfully — leading in the end to a death toll for the two cities conservatively estimated at more than 250,000?”

Appy concedes, and I agree, that any kind of apology is unlikely in the foreseeable future given current politics. But the issue is too important not to discuss.

Even if there was some agreement on the morality of the bombings, there is another hurdle to overcome before we can ever get to an apology. There is a widespread belief that apologies are for the weak. This is unfortunate. In reality, apologies show a strength of character that is hard to find among leaders today. An exception is Pope Francis, who has improved the standing of the Catholic Church by apologizing for the “past sins” of the church. (e.g. Bolivia)

In 1995, the Japanese Prime Minister apologized for their war crimes, as he should have. But the current Prime Minister, Shinzo Abe, has done much to undermine the good will that was achieved by these apologies, to the detriment of Japan’s relationships with South Korea and China.

Apologies go a long way towards healing relationships between victim(s) and the wrongdoer. It is not only the right thing to do; it goes a long way towards creating amicable relationships. Therefore, it would be in our interest to apologize. An apology would also go a long way in improving our image in the world.

Read Appy’s informative and thoughtful essay on this topic here: History News Network | Our ‘Merciful’ Ending to the ‘Good War’.

Standard narrative: The U.S. dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end the war quickly and save American lives. Part of this narrative is the claim that the Japanese were warned and that the cities were military targets.

Nagasaki bomb

All the ways the new AP US history standards gloss over the country’s racist past

Jake Flanagin discusses the recent changes to the AP History guidelines that were prompted by the conservative backlash charging that the standards were too focused on the negative rather than American exceptionalism.