This is a great article from The Guardian explaining why payment for results in education is a bad idea and should be rejected. Thanks for posting this Diane!
The Guardian of London has an excellent article that explains why payment by results always fails. The article is based on a study that the article links to.
Two examples of payment by results in the current “education reform” strategy that is promoted by the Obama administration: basing teacher evaluation on test scores and merit pay.
The article calls payment by results in “dangerous idiocy” and explains why:
“Payment by results is a simple idea: people and organisations should only get paid for what they deliver. Who could argue with that? If your job is to get people back to work, then find them a job dammit.
“Plenty of people working in local government and public services are already starting to realise this is nonsense, and a pernicious, damaging nonsense at that. The evidence is very clear: if you pay (or otherwise manage performance) based on a set of pre-defined…
View original post 332 more words
One thought on “The Guardian: Why Payment by Results Is “Dangerous Idiocy””
I thought this was about paying students for achieving results. Some guy in NJ, I believe, tried that experiment. Paying students to get good grades or paying parents to get their kids to school everyday.